光电工程师社区

标题: 倍频激光器,,,,光束质量 [打印本页]

作者: 无聊瓜子 时间: 2007-11-26 21:10
标题: 倍频激光器,,,,光束质量
为什么激光器内放了倍频晶体后,光束质量就变得不好了?这是为什么啊 ?

欢迎各位大侠前来探讨留言.

作者: 14808092 时间: 2007-11-28 15:03
是没人能回答，还是不愿来回答！！

作者: free 时间: 2007-11-28 15:25
插入了一个东西，肯定会影响到它的光束质量啊。如果切割角度不是特别准确，就是说将倍频晶体垂直与光轴放置，此时的功率不一定是最高的，反而需要倾斜一定的小角度，然倾斜后则会将光束质量破坏。
或者有可能是倍频晶体的内部一些质量原因造成的。

还有就是倍频晶体本身会有走离角walk-off angel.

随便瞎说的

作者: 再也不能这样 时间: 2007-11-28 17:48
倍频晶体有热透镜效应，改变了腔的参数。。。。

作者: wwwcai 时间: 2007-11-28 19:07
标题: 回复 #1 无聊瓜子的帖子
可能你本身腔就设计得不好。基频的光束质量不好的话，谐波的光束质量也不可能好。我想走离会影响光斑的形状，比如光斑变扁，但是光束质量可能还是好的。

作者: EinsteinDirac 时间: 2007-12-3 23:14
因为高阶模在外围，功率密度较低，且发散角较大，这使得它已经超出倍频晶体的接受角的范围了，且功率较低，倍频效率很低，所以高阶模在倍频光中被过滤掉了，所以光束质量好了。

作者: bigflfl 时间: 2007-12-4 09:43

原帖由 再也不能这样 于 2007-11-28 17:48 发表
倍频晶体有热透镜效应，改变了腔的参数。。。。

好像这东西大家讨论的比较少。您有这方面参数吗？腔内1064大概15W,lbo上光斑60微米的样子。lbo上大概热透镜多少？

作者: along1980 时间: 2007-12-9 22:15
可能你本身腔就设计得不好..光的发散角骗大，，，

作者: 再也不能这样 时间: 2007-12-10 10:05
标题: 回复 #7 bigflfl 的帖子
http://www.gklaser.com/HTML/filedown/2006480.html
非线性光学晶体的热透镜效应研究
这篇文章可能对你有帮助。

作者: EinsteinDirac 时间: 2007-12-18 22:21
你用的什么倍频晶体？如果晶体的走离角很大的话会对光斑带来很坏的影响。

作者: laser.f 时间: 2007-12-19 11:33

走离角太大吧。bibo，bbo之类的。

作者: weiyouliang 时间: 2007-12-20 16:33
标题: LBO只有KTP晶体的一半左右
可以用KTP试一试,当然转换效率与定向角度和倍频晶体长度以及腔型参数以及泵浦光的光束质量都有关系。如果您想用KTP,我们公司有，您可以打电话0532-88701663和卫先生讨论一下。青岛海泰光电技术有限公司

作者: iofuturelin 时间: 2007-12-21 18:35
标题: 回复 #3 free 的帖子
我觉得他这样的问题根本没发回答，呵呵，至少要知道功率大小，腔内腔外，波长吧？嗬嗬

作者: linjipeng 时间: 2007-12-25 10:25
瓜子最近做腔内倍频啊？？呵呵。多交流。
谢谢九楼的链接

作者: 无聊瓜子 时间: 2007-12-29 22:44
我这个帖子技术量那么高,怎么大家都不想发表点什么意见呢?

真让我失望啊

对回帖的兄弟们表示感谢.

我会听取你们的意见,对激光器进行改进的.

多谢了

作者: watermoon 时间: 2008-1-2 11:18
没说明白光束质量不好了是指什么不好了？
激光器的结构是怎么样的？腔内还是腔外？腔外的话是否经过聚焦？
光束质量差了是发散角变大了还是M2因子变大了？
都没说。

作者: 无聊瓜子 时间: 2008-1-2 13:33
看来啊
很多人都是没机会亲身做做实验的
没亲身体验过,当然不知道我在说什么了

各位,加油了

希望高手能帮我解答

作者: t0y 时间: 2008-1-2 17:20

Principles of Nonlinear Optics (Wiley Series in Pure and Applied Optics) (Hardcover)
by Y. R. Shen (Author) "Physics would be dull and life most unfulfilling if all physical phenomena around us were linear..." (more)

Nonlinear Optics, Second Edition (Hardcover)
by Robert W. Boyd (Author) "Nonlinear optics is the study of phenomena that occur as a consequence of the modification of the optical properties of a material system by the..." (more)

Fig. 1: Spatial walk-off: the intensity distribution of a beam in an anisotropic crystal propagates in a direction which is somewhat different from that of the wave vector.

Spatial walk-off
Definition: the phenomenon that the intensity distribution of a beam in an anisotropic crystal drifts away from the direction of the wave vector

For a laser beam propagating in an isotropic medium, the transverse intensity distribution propagates along the beam axis as defined by the medium k vector.

In anisotropic (and thus birefringent双折射晶体) crystals, this is not necessarily the case: it can occur that the intensity distribution drifts away from the direction defined by the k vector, as illustrated in Fig. 1, where the gray lines indicate wavefronts and the blue color the region with optical intensity. This phenomenon, called spatial walk-of, birefringent walk-off or Poynting vector walk-off , is associated with some finite angle ρ (called walk-off angle走离角) between the Poynting vector （能流传播方向）and the k vector（波前传播方向）. The Poynting vector defines the direction of energy transport, while the k vector is normal to the wavefronts.

Spatial Walk-Off in Nonlinear Interactions

Spatial walk-off is encountered in nonlinear frequency conversion schemes based on critical phase matching in nonlinear crystals. Its consequence is that the waves interacting within a focused beam lose their spatial overlap during propagation, because those waves with extraordinary polarization experience the walk-off, while this is not the case for those with ordinary polarization. (Note that birefringent phase matching necessarily involves beams with both polarization states.)

In effect, the useful interaction length and thus the conversion efficiency can be limited, and the spatial profile of product beams may be broadened and the beam quality reduced（倍频光束质量下降）.

Unfortunately, it is no solution simply to work with more strongly focused beams, requiring a shorter interaction length, because the spatial walk-off becomes more important for smaller beam radii.（进一步聚焦，可以缩短基波与非线性晶体作用长度，但是这对于补偿走离效应无济于事） The problem gets reduced, however, for high optical intensities, which allow for good conversion within a short length.

The phenomenon of spatial walk-off is directly related to that of a finite angular phase-matching bandwidth. The equation above shows that a large walk-off angle occurs in situations with a strong angular dependence of the extraordinary refractive index. In such cases, the phase-matching conditions also strongly depend on the propagation angle, and phase matching becomes incomplete when using tightly focused beams, having a large beam divergence.

It is possible to achieve a kind of walk-off compensation [1] by using two subsequent nonlinear crystals which are oriented so that the walk-off directions are opposite to each other. There is then still walk-off within these crystals, but its overall effect can be strongly reduced.

Spatial walk-off can be avoided altogether by using a noncritical phase matching scheme. This, however, generally requires operation of the crystal at a temperature which is not by coincidence close to room temperature.

[ 本帖最后由 t0y 于 2008-1-2 17:26 编辑 ]

作者: 波斯地毯 时间: 2008-1-3 17:06
顶起！

高深！！！

我是学生。

作者: lisqun 时间: 2008-1-8 18:13
相当地专业！但是好象和使用的倍频晶体有很大关系。

作者: 无聊瓜子 时间: 2008-1-8 18:59
我还在寻找答案

希望大家多多指教

[ 本帖最后由无聊瓜子于 2008-1-8 19:03 编辑 ]

作者: zgzxb 时间: 2008-1-14 13:17
KTP和LBO以及BBO晶体是目前比较成熟和常用的倍频晶体。腔内倍频输出光束质量变差外，还会引起输出功率不稳定等问题。这是腔内倍频不可克服的缺点。
顺便问一下：大家在做倍频是哪个晶体用的比较多啊？？？

作者: watermoon 时间: 2008-1-14 13:42

原帖由 zgzxb 于 2008-1-14 13:17 发表
KTP和LBO以及BBO晶体是目前比较成熟和常用的倍频晶体。腔内倍频输出光束质量变差外，还会引起输出功率不稳定等问题。这是腔内倍频不可克服的缺点。
顺便问一下：大家在做倍频是哪个晶体用的比较多啊？？？

目前应该说，还是KTP晶体用得比较多吧。。。

作者: annespring 时间: 2008-1-14 13:44

原帖由 watermoon 于 2008-1-14 13:42 发表

目前应该说，还是KTP晶体用得比较多吧。。。

小功率的用KTP

作者: lisqun 时间: 2008-1-14 23:06
KTP、SKTP、LBO、BIBO都有用的到。论数量的话，肯定是KTP了，胶合晶体的数量是惊人地。

欢迎光临光电工程师社区 (http://bbs.oecr.com/)