|
|
2楼

楼主 |
发表于 2003-11-11 17:24:00
|
只看该作者
物方远心光路设置?
陈教授给我的答复,不是很明白,大家帮我理解一下,谢谢!
I quessed that you are talking about telecentric.
This is actually very simple to do by using solve, e.g., by controlling chief ray. Similarly, afocal can be achieved easily by the default solve, say by controlling axial ray. (Of course, you don’’t have to limit yourself to condiser these rays only in image space.) You can also make these (telecentric or afocal) by rearranging the setting in setup without too many efforts. Of course, you can settle these (telecentric or afocal, for examples) by using optimization (operands). Which is better? Hard to say. It depends greatly on the nature of the design task you are working on.
There are many different kinds of solve in OSLO as default function, including some very unique ones, e.g., the Wassermann-Wolf solve.
In future version of OSLO, the user will be allowed to implement their own solve as to my knowledge. That will greatly enhance the design capability.
|
|